Territorial jurisdiction for money-laundering trials is revised for specified districts, replacing earlier court-area entries under the statutory fram...
Post-conviction compounding of a cheque dishonour offence is unavailable once criminal revision has been dismissed on merits and has affirmed the conviction and sentence. Finality prevents inherent jurisdiction from being used to review or nullify a concluded criminal adjudication, and a subsequent settlement cannot indirectly reopen the conviction. Authorities permitting compounding were distinguishable on the stated facts. The petition seeking compounding was not maintainable; compounding was declined and the petition was dismissed with costs.
Post-conviction compounding of a cheque dishonour offence is unavailable once criminal revision has been dismissed on merits and has affirmed the conviction and sentence. Finality prevents inherent jurisdiction from being used to review or nullify a concluded criminal adjudication, and a subsequent settlement cannot indirectly reopen the conviction. Authorities permitting compounding were distinguishable on the stated facts. The petition seeking compounding was not maintainable; compounding was declined and the petition was dismissed with costs.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.