Pre-existing disputes over outcome-based professional fees can bar Section 9 insolvency proceedings where contractual entitlement requires investigati...
Corresponding scheduled offences preserve money-laundering jurisdiction despite repeal of the central corruption provision where conduct remains cover...
Concurrent anticipatory-bail jurisdiction permits applications before either forum, while secured evidence may negate custodial interrogation in GST e...
Page of 4881
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 97618 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Customs Broker due diligence requires prescribed KYC, not detecting misdeclarations discoverable only through physical examination, defeating licence revocation.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Customs Broker licence revocation, security forfeiture and penalty require proof of established statutory breaches, rather than apprehension of future misconduct. An importer's authorisation and prescribed KYC records satisfy authorisation and verification duties where the broker files documents supplied by the importer. A discrepancy in goods or brand particulars that emerges only on physical examination does not establish a failure of due diligence. Speed-and-efficiency obligations do not require BIS certificate verification, and cooperation in the investigation defeats a non-cooperation allegation. As the alleged breaches were unproved, the revocation, forfeiture and penalty were set aside.
Customs Broker licence revocation, security forfeiture and penalty require proof of established statutory breaches, rather than apprehension of future misconduct. An importer's authorisation and prescribed KYC records satisfy authorisation and verification duties where the broker files documents supplied by the importer. A discrepancy in goods or brand particulars that emerges only on physical examination does not establish a failure of due diligence. Speed-and-efficiency obligations do not require BIS certificate verification, and cooperation in the investigation defeats a non-cooperation allegation. As the alleged breaches were unproved, the revocation, forfeiture and penalty were set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.