Permanent-establishment reassessment cannot revisit scrutinised disclosures; extended reopening fails without undisclosed material facts and within st...
Modified returns after business reorganisation must be assessed within pending proceedings, barring parallel scrutiny and consequential transfer prici...
Turnover mismatches under percentage-completion accounting cannot alone establish suppressed income where customer advances remain recorded as liabili...
Page of 4881
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
541 to 560 of 97618 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Article 5(2)(l) of the India-USA DTAA requires cumulative satisfaction of services being furnished or performed in India through employees or other personnel for the prescribed period before a service permanent establishment arises. Cost-to-cost reimbursements of expenditure initially incurred and later cross-charged without mark-up do not establish such a presence where the activity is performed remotely and the non-resident's employees or personnel have no physical presence in India. In those circumstances, no service permanent establishment or taxable income in India arises from the reimbursements.
Article 5(2)(l) of the India-USA DTAA requires cumulative satisfaction of services being furnished or performed in India through employees or other personnel for the prescribed period before a service permanent establishment arises. Cost-to-cost reimbursements of expenditure initially incurred and later cross-charged without mark-up do not establish such a presence where the activity is performed remotely and the non-resident's employees or personnel have no physical presence in India. In those circumstances, no service permanent establishment or taxable income in India arises from the reimbursements.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.