COVID-19 limitation exclusion and destination-specific e-way bills govern revisional timelines and penalties for undocumented third-party plywood deli...
Questions arising from miscellaneous application orders cannot challenge unaltered Tribunal findings, leaving the original order separately challengea...
Transfer-pricing comparability filters require fresh arm's-length analysis, while delayed receivables need separate reconsideration with working-capit...
Section 153C jurisdiction requires timely deemed search and assessee-specific satisfaction material; otherwise reassessment must use the proper statut...
Penalty for alleged cash receipt cannot be imposed without demonstrative evidence establishing the actual cash transaction required for the cash-receipt restriction. Material showed a cash receipt only to a limited extent, while the balance was inferred conjecturally. Because the Revenue did not establish the factual basis for invoking section 269SS, deletion of the section 271D penalty was confirmed and its appeal dismissed.
Penalty for alleged cash receipt cannot be imposed without demonstrative evidence establishing the actual cash transaction required for the cash-receipt restriction. Material showed a cash receipt only to a limited extent, while the balance was inferred conjecturally. Because the Revenue did not establish the factual basis for invoking section 269SS, deletion of the section 271D penalty was confirmed and its appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
