Transfer-pricing benchmarking confines adjustments to associated-enterprise transactions and integrates delayed receivables through TNMM working-capit...
Medical relief status protects government-contracted mobile healthcare from commercial classification, while provisional registration cancellation req...
Charitable registration cancellation requires proof that educational activities abandoned their objects; incidental receipts and retained surplus are ...
Prospective customs notification amendments cannot bar provisional release consideration for earlier imports when bills of lading predate their commen...
Personal guarantor insolvency jurisdiction follows the corporate debtor's CIRP Bench, enabling inter-territorial transfer and preventing parallel proc...
Section 47-A undervaluation threshold: fraudulent intent requirement faces reconsideration after referral to a larger Bench for authoritative resoluti...
RBI supersession powers over multi-State co-operative banks operate independently of the constitutional six-month ceiling and permit statutory extensi...
Page of 4891
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1101 to 1120 of 97809 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Availability of an alternative statutory appellate remedy ordinarily warrants restraint in exercising writ jurisdiction, but does not create an absolute bar. Customs treatment of adult sex toys as prohibited goods may be challenged where no statutory or notification-based prohibition is identified and the classification is alleged to rest on subjective morality rather than objective law. Such allegations, given their effect on the right to trade, can justify writ scrutiny despite an appellate remedy. The merits of whether the goods are prohibited remain open.
Availability of an alternative statutory appellate remedy ordinarily warrants restraint in exercising writ jurisdiction, but does not create an absolute bar. Customs treatment of adult sex toys as prohibited goods may be challenged where no statutory or notification-based prohibition is identified and the classification is alleged to rest on subjective morality rather than objective law. Such allegations, given their effect on the right to trade, can justify writ scrutiny despite an appellate remedy. The merits of whether the goods are prohibited remain open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.