Permanent establishment tests: independent subsidiary premises and principal-to-principal dealings did not create Indian taxability for offshore suppl...
Valuation Officer estimates govern property-value additions once statutory valuation is invoked, requiring fresh consideration of objections and compa...
Waiver of written show-cause notice may prevent a later procedural challenge after participation in customs adjudication, preserving statutory appella...
Retrospective invalidity of ocean-freight IGST supports refunds despite non-party status and prior credit utilisation, subject to authorised appeal gr...
Additional evidence in departmental appeals may include show-cause-notice material without introducing a new case where it merely corroborates existin...
Reasoned rectification orders require consideration of expenditure disclosed in income-tax returns, preventing revision based on incomplete income com...
Modified returns after business reorganisations cannot trigger fresh scrutiny once the original assessment was complete, invalidating related transfer...
Page of 4891
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 97820 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Availability of an alternative statutory appellate remedy ordinarily warrants restraint in exercising writ jurisdiction, but does not create an absolute bar. Customs treatment of adult sex toys as prohibited goods may be challenged where no statutory or notification-based prohibition is identified and the classification is alleged to rest on subjective morality rather than objective law. Such allegations, given their effect on the right to trade, can justify writ scrutiny despite an appellate remedy. The merits of whether the goods are prohibited remain open.
Availability of an alternative statutory appellate remedy ordinarily warrants restraint in exercising writ jurisdiction, but does not create an absolute bar. Customs treatment of adult sex toys as prohibited goods may be challenged where no statutory or notification-based prohibition is identified and the classification is alleged to rest on subjective morality rather than objective law. Such allegations, given their effect on the right to trade, can justify writ scrutiny despite an appellate remedy. The merits of whether the goods are prohibited remain open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.