GST payment representations require record-based, reasoned decisions while substantive entitlement remains open for determination by competent authori...
Reassessment sanction under extended limitation required approval from the competent specified authority, invalidating proceedings approved by an inco...
Internal CUP benchmarking for fixed-rate Masala Bonds prevails over floating external comparables, eliminating the related transfer-pricing adjustment...
Jurisdictional validity of revision notices: incorrect official capacity and mere change of opinion invalidate revision of property income assessments...
Section 110(5) of the Customs Act limits provisional attachment of a bank account to six months, with only one further extension of up to six months based on written reasons communicated before the original period expires. A show-cause notice or pending adjudication cannot independently prolong attachment beyond that statutory maximum. Once the period ends, the attachment ceases by efflux of time and cannot be continued through administrative action. Continued freezing without statutory authority requires defreezing of the account, without limiting any other action permitted by law.
Section 110(5) of the Customs Act limits provisional attachment of a bank account to six months, with only one further extension of up to six months based on written reasons communicated before the original period expires. A show-cause notice or pending adjudication cannot independently prolong attachment beyond that statutory maximum. Once the period ends, the attachment ceases by efflux of time and cannot be continued through administrative action. Continued freezing without statutory authority requires defreezing of the account, without limiting any other action permitted by law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.