Business expenditure and depreciation rules allow operational outgoings while limiting disallowances for personal elements and unsupported third-party...
Compromise-and-arrangement extensions may accommodate debt assignment where creditor commercial judgment supports value maximisation and avoids proced...
Delayed-payment surcharge is not taxable tolerance consideration where it penalises default, while meter testing follows electricity distribution trea...
Sufficient cause for delayed revenue income-tax appeals requires bona fides, due diligence and a credible explanation; otherwise limitation bars appea...
Inverted-duty-structure refunds remain available for unchanged-rate apparel supplies despite trader status and require tax-period-specific computation...
Page of 4881
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
781 to 800 of 97618 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Limitation for appeals under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code requires filing within 30 days of the impugned order. The appellate forum may condone delay only for a further period not exceeding 15 days on sufficient cause and has no jurisdiction to entertain an appeal beyond that maximum period. Availability of the order in the public domain on the date of pronouncement defeats a contrary assertion of delayed upload, while unsupported claims regarding delayed receipt of a certified copy do not establish sufficient cause. Knowledge of the order is not an independent basis for extending limitation under the insolvency regime. An appeal filed beyond the maximum condonable period against revival of the corporate insolvency resolution process is therefore not maintainable.
Limitation for appeals under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code requires filing within 30 days of the impugned order. The appellate forum may condone delay only for a further period not exceeding 15 days on sufficient cause and has no jurisdiction to entertain an appeal beyond that maximum period. Availability of the order in the public domain on the date of pronouncement defeats a contrary assertion of delayed upload, while unsupported claims regarding delayed receipt of a certified copy do not establish sufficient cause. Knowledge of the order is not an independent basis for extending limitation under the insolvency regime. An appeal filed beyond the maximum condonable period against revival of the corporate insolvency resolution process is therefore not maintainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
