Income-tax prosecution fails when appellate remand removes its factual foundation; directors require company arraignment for vicarious criminal liabil...
Capital character of assignment consideration prevents taxation as residuary income, while unsupported interest-related expenditure remains non-deduct...
Make-available condition shields regional support-service receipts from Indian taxation where no independent capability or permanent establishment exi...
Transfer-pricing treatment of corporate guarantees and convertible loans followed prior-year consistency, with taxable foreign dividends excluded from...
Transfer-pricing benchmarking confines adjustments to associated-enterprise transactions and integrates delayed receivables through TNMM working-capit...
Medical relief status protects government-contracted mobile healthcare from commercial classification, while provisional registration cancellation req...
Charitable registration cancellation requires proof that educational activities abandoned their objects; incidental receipts and retained surplus are ...
Reassessment notices alleging fictitious or accommodation transactions must disclose material particulars and incriminating material that prima facie link the assessee to the alleged transactions. Screenshots of Case Related Information Detail, without the underlying dissemination reports or transaction details, do not provide a meaningful statutory opportunity to respond. The Assessing Officer must independently consider the dissemination material and address objections and supporting evidence. Supplying foundational material only during writ proceedings cannot cure the defect. Failure to meet these requirements resulted in quashing of the reassessment notice, the consequential order, and the subsequent notice, without remand.
Reassessment notices alleging fictitious or accommodation transactions must disclose material particulars and incriminating material that prima facie link the assessee to the alleged transactions. Screenshots of Case Related Information Detail, without the underlying dissemination reports or transaction details, do not provide a meaningful statutory opportunity to respond. The Assessing Officer must independently consider the dissemination material and address objections and supporting evidence. Supplying foundational material only during writ proceedings cannot cure the defect. Failure to meet these requirements resulted in quashing of the reassessment notice, the consequential order, and the subsequent notice, without remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4891 
