Income-tax prosecution fails when appellate remand removes its factual foundation; directors require company arraignment for vicarious criminal liabil...
Capital character of assignment consideration prevents taxation as residuary income, while unsupported interest-related expenditure remains non-deduct...
Make-available condition shields regional support-service receipts from Indian taxation where no independent capability or permanent establishment exi...
Transfer-pricing treatment of corporate guarantees and convertible loans followed prior-year consistency, with taxable foreign dividends excluded from...
Transfer-pricing benchmarking confines adjustments to associated-enterprise transactions and integrates delayed receivables through TNMM working-capit...
Medical relief status protects government-contracted mobile healthcare from commercial classification, while provisional registration cancellation req...
Charitable registration cancellation requires proof that educational activities abandoned their objects; incidental receipts and retained surplus are ...
Declarations under section 194C(6) need not follow the CBDT circular format, but must contain essential freight-charge and goods-carriage registration particulars to establish eligibility for non-deduction of tax on payments to small transport operators. Declarations cannot be rejected solely for format non-compliance or lack of independent verification, although identified discrepancies or omissions must be put to the payer; the ITAT remanded the matter because transporter-specific deficiencies were not identified. Physical Form 26A certificates must also be examined under the first proviso to section 201(1) to determine whether payees included freight income in their returns and paid due tax. Assessee-in-default liability and the alternative Form 26A claim were remanded for fresh consideration.
Declarations under section 194C(6) need not follow the CBDT circular format, but must contain essential freight-charge and goods-carriage registration particulars to establish eligibility for non-deduction of tax on payments to small transport operators. Declarations cannot be rejected solely for format non-compliance or lack of independent verification, although identified discrepancies or omissions must be put to the payer; the ITAT remanded the matter because transporter-specific deficiencies were not identified. Physical Form 26A certificates must also be examined under the first proviso to section 201(1) to determine whether payees included freight income in their returns and paid due tax. Assessee-in-default liability and the alternative Form 26A claim were remanded for fresh consideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4891 
