Transfer-pricing benchmarking confines adjustments to associated-enterprise transactions and integrates delayed receivables through TNMM working-capit...
Medical relief status protects government-contracted mobile healthcare from commercial classification, while provisional registration cancellation req...
Charitable registration cancellation requires proof that educational activities abandoned their objects; incidental receipts and retained surplus are ...
Prospective customs notification amendments cannot bar provisional release consideration for earlier imports when bills of lading predate their commen...
Personal guarantor insolvency jurisdiction follows the corporate debtor's CIRP Bench, enabling inter-territorial transfer and preventing parallel proc...
Section 47-A undervaluation threshold: fraudulent intent requirement faces reconsideration after referral to a larger Bench for authoritative resoluti...
RBI supersession powers over multi-State co-operative banks operate independently of the constitutional six-month ceiling and permit statutory extensi...
Page of 4891
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1101 to 1120 of 97809 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Closing-stock valuation based on net realisable value requires supporting material establishing the basis of that value. The High Court found that the assessee had not substantiated its claimed net realisable value, while the Assessing Officer adopted a realisable or market value below cost. The principle of consistency did not apply because there was no change in the valuation method. The appellate authorities' findings on the applicable valuation rate were concurrent findings of fact, raising no substantial question of law. The addition for undervaluation of closing stock was therefore sustained and the tax appeal was dismissed.
Closing-stock valuation based on net realisable value requires supporting material establishing the basis of that value. The High Court found that the assessee had not substantiated its claimed net realisable value, while the Assessing Officer adopted a realisable or market value below cost. The principle of consistency did not apply because there was no change in the valuation method. The appellate authorities' findings on the applicable valuation rate were concurrent findings of fact, raising no substantial question of law. The addition for undervaluation of closing stock was therefore sustained and the tax appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4891 
