Capital character of assignment consideration prevents taxation as residuary income, while unsupported interest-related expenditure remains non-deduct...
Make-available condition shields regional support-service receipts from Indian taxation where no independent capability or permanent establishment exi...
Transfer-pricing treatment of corporate guarantees and convertible loans followed prior-year consistency, with taxable foreign dividends excluded from...
Transfer-pricing benchmarking confines adjustments to associated-enterprise transactions and integrates delayed receivables through TNMM working-capit...
Medical relief status protects government-contracted mobile healthcare from commercial classification, while provisional registration cancellation req...
Charitable registration cancellation requires proof that educational activities abandoned their objects; incidental receipts and retained surplus are ...
Prospective customs notification amendments cannot bar provisional release consideration for earlier imports when bills of lading predate their commen...
Portal-only GST service may be inadequate where it does not provide effective notice of the complete show cause notice or reasoned order and thereby denies a meaningful opportunity to respond. Section 169 permits Common Portal availability as a mode of service, but Rule 142 distinguishes FORM GST DRC-01 and DRC-07 electronic summaries from the underlying notice or order. Section 75 requires a hearing where an adverse decision is contemplated and reasons in the adjudication order. Retrospective expansion of Common Portal functions does not by itself cure deficient communication. For appellate limitation, proof of upload or dispatch may not establish effective communication where accessibility, actual or constructive knowledge, or retrieval of the complete communication remains unproven.
Portal-only GST service may be inadequate where it does not provide effective notice of the complete show cause notice or reasoned order and thereby denies a meaningful opportunity to respond. Section 169 permits Common Portal availability as a mode of service, but Rule 142 distinguishes FORM GST DRC-01 and DRC-07 electronic summaries from the underlying notice or order. Section 75 requires a hearing where an adverse decision is contemplated and reasons in the adjudication order. Retrospective expansion of Common Portal functions does not by itself cure deficient communication. For appellate limitation, proof of upload or dispatch may not establish effective communication where accessibility, actual or constructive knowledge, or retrieval of the complete communication remains unproven.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.