Pre-existing disputes over outcome-based professional fees can bar Section 9 insolvency proceedings where contractual entitlement requires investigati...
Corresponding scheduled offences preserve money-laundering jurisdiction despite repeal of the central corruption provision where conduct remains cover...
Concurrent anticipatory-bail jurisdiction permits applications before either forum, while secured evidence may negate custodial interrogation in GST e...
Page of 4881
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 97618 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Portal-only GST service may be inadequate where it does not provide effective notice of the complete show cause notice or reasoned order and thereby denies a meaningful opportunity to respond. Section 169 permits Common Portal availability as a mode of service, but Rule 142 distinguishes FORM GST DRC-01 and DRC-07 electronic summaries from the underlying notice or order. Section 75 requires a hearing where an adverse decision is contemplated and reasons in the adjudication order. Retrospective expansion of Common Portal functions does not by itself cure deficient communication. For appellate limitation, proof of upload or dispatch may not establish effective communication where accessibility, actual or constructive knowledge, or retrieval of the complete communication remains unproven.
Portal-only GST service may be inadequate where it does not provide effective notice of the complete show cause notice or reasoned order and thereby denies a meaningful opportunity to respond. Section 169 permits Common Portal availability as a mode of service, but Rule 142 distinguishes FORM GST DRC-01 and DRC-07 electronic summaries from the underlying notice or order. Section 75 requires a hearing where an adverse decision is contemplated and reasons in the adjudication order. Retrospective expansion of Common Portal functions does not by itself cure deficient communication. For appellate limitation, proof of upload or dispatch may not establish effective communication where accessibility, actual or constructive knowledge, or retrieval of the complete communication remains unproven.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.