Transfer-pricing benchmarking confines adjustments to associated-enterprise transactions and integrates delayed receivables through TNMM working-capit...
Medical relief status protects government-contracted mobile healthcare from commercial classification, while provisional registration cancellation req...
Charitable registration cancellation requires proof that educational activities abandoned their objects; incidental receipts and retained surplus are ...
Prospective customs notification amendments cannot bar provisional release consideration for earlier imports when bills of lading predate their commen...
Personal guarantor insolvency jurisdiction follows the corporate debtor's CIRP Bench, enabling inter-territorial transfer and preventing parallel proc...
Section 47-A undervaluation threshold: fraudulent intent requirement faces reconsideration after referral to a larger Bench for authoritative resoluti...
RBI supersession powers over multi-State co-operative banks operate independently of the constitutional six-month ceiling and permit statutory extensi...
Page of 4883
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
941 to 960 of 97649 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Insolvency Professionals must conduct further enquiry where indicators suggest that CIRP or liquidation may be used for a fraudulent or malicious purpose unrelated to insolvency resolution or liquidation. Relevant indicators include a dominant recently assigned single creditor, connected corporate debtors entering CIRP with overlapping creditors, limited competitive bidding, unsupported disproportionate recoveries, links to fraud proceedings, and unjustified related-party loans or write-offs. Indicators are illustrative and not conclusive; they require holistic, contextual assessment based on records available in the ordinary course. Where reasonable grounds support suspected misuse, the IP must apply to the Adjudicating Authority, identifying the indicators, supporting material, and reasons for seeking directions.
Insolvency Professionals must conduct further enquiry where indicators suggest that CIRP or liquidation may be used for a fraudulent or malicious purpose unrelated to insolvency resolution or liquidation. Relevant indicators include a dominant recently assigned single creditor, connected corporate debtors entering CIRP with overlapping creditors, limited competitive bidding, unsupported disproportionate recoveries, links to fraud proceedings, and unjustified related-party loans or write-offs. Indicators are illustrative and not conclusive; they require holistic, contextual assessment based on records available in the ordinary course. Where reasonable grounds support suspected misuse, the IP must apply to the Adjudicating Authority, identifying the indicators, supporting material, and reasons for seeking directions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4883 
