Reasoned rectification orders require consideration of expenditure disclosed in income-tax returns, preventing revision based on incomplete income com...
Modified returns after business reorganisations cannot trigger fresh scrutiny once the original assessment was complete, invalidating related transfer...
Third-party loose sheets require reliable nexus before supporting unexplained expenditure additions; presumptions do not establish payer identity or o...
TNMM comparability using audited accounts and working-capital adjustments can eliminate unwarranted transfer-pricing additions where verified margins ...
Gross-profit additions on disputed purchases require reasoned appellate determination; disclosed claims alone do not support inaccurate-particulars pe...
Limitation after transfer-pricing remand: fresh TPO reference did not extend the assessment deadline, rendering the consequential assessment time-barr...
Interim judicial restraint on tax deduction prevents default, while supporting reasonable cause and penalty deletion for foreign-leg LFC reimbursement...
Palmolein classification defeated the crude-oil concession; material misdeclaration sustained recovery and confiscation, while separate false-document...
E-invoicing applies to coaching-service supplies genuinely made to registered recipients where the supplier falls within the notified class and no exclusion applies. Recipient status depends on an enforceable contractual liability to pay consideration; the student may be the beneficiary, while a parent, guardian or sponsoring enterprise may be the recipient only if contractual terms establish that liability. Mere fee payment or provision of a GSTIN is insufficient. Proposed-supply questions may be raised, but recipient identity and place of supply cannot be determined through advance ruling where they require transaction-specific assessment. Supplier e-invoicing obligations operate independently of the recipient's input tax credit eligibility or business purpose.
E-invoicing applies to coaching-service supplies genuinely made to registered recipients where the supplier falls within the notified class and no exclusion applies. Recipient status depends on an enforceable contractual liability to pay consideration; the student may be the beneficiary, while a parent, guardian or sponsoring enterprise may be the recipient only if contractual terms establish that liability. Mere fee payment or provision of a GSTIN is insufficient. Proposed-supply questions may be raised, but recipient identity and place of supply cannot be determined through advance ruling where they require transaction-specific assessment. Supplier e-invoicing obligations operate independently of the recipient's input tax credit eligibility or business purpose.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4897 
