Pre-existing disputes over outcome-based professional fees can bar Section 9 insolvency proceedings where contractual entitlement requires investigati...
Corresponding scheduled offences preserve money-laundering jurisdiction despite repeal of the central corruption provision where conduct remains cover...
Concurrent anticipatory-bail jurisdiction permits applications before either forum, while secured evidence may negate custodial interrogation in GST e...
Page of 4881
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 97618 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 10(23C) exemption for the relevant year did not require return filing by entities outside the categories expressly covered by the Twentieth Proviso. A later amendment imposing a return-filing condition for specified entities could not be applied to that year. Where the revenue authorities did not find that the substantive exemption conditions were unmet, non-filing of a return alone could not defeat the claim. Exemption was consequently directed to be granted in accordance with law, and the income assessed under "Income from Other Sources" was deleted.
Section 10(23C) exemption for the relevant year did not require return filing by entities outside the categories expressly covered by the Twentieth Proviso. A later amendment imposing a return-filing condition for specified entities could not be applied to that year. Where the revenue authorities did not find that the substantive exemption conditions were unmet, non-filing of a return alone could not defeat the claim. Exemption was consequently directed to be granted in accordance with law, and the income assessed under "Income from Other Sources" was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.