Permanent-establishment reassessment cannot revisit scrutinised disclosures; extended reopening fails without undisclosed material facts and within st...
Modified returns after business reorganisation must be assessed within pending proceedings, barring parallel scrutiny and consequential transfer prici...
Turnover mismatches under percentage-completion accounting cannot alone establish suppressed income where customer advances remain recorded as liabili...
Page of 4881
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
541 to 560 of 97618 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 10(23C) exemption for the relevant year did not require return filing by entities outside the categories expressly covered by the Twentieth Proviso. A later amendment imposing a return-filing condition for specified entities could not be applied to that year. Where the revenue authorities did not find that the substantive exemption conditions were unmet, non-filing of a return alone could not defeat the claim. Exemption was consequently directed to be granted in accordance with law, and the income assessed under "Income from Other Sources" was deleted.
Section 10(23C) exemption for the relevant year did not require return filing by entities outside the categories expressly covered by the Twentieth Proviso. A later amendment imposing a return-filing condition for specified entities could not be applied to that year. Where the revenue authorities did not find that the substantive exemption conditions were unmet, non-filing of a return alone could not defeat the claim. Exemption was consequently directed to be granted in accordance with law, and the income assessed under "Income from Other Sources" was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.