Business expenditure and depreciation rules allow operational outgoings while limiting disallowances for personal elements and unsupported third-party...
Compromise-and-arrangement extensions may accommodate debt assignment where creditor commercial judgment supports value maximisation and avoids proced...
Delayed-payment surcharge is not taxable tolerance consideration where it penalises default, while meter testing follows electricity distribution trea...
Sufficient cause for delayed revenue income-tax appeals requires bona fides, due diligence and a credible explanation; otherwise limitation bars appea...
Inverted-duty-structure refunds remain available for unchanged-rate apparel supplies despite trader status and require tax-period-specific computation...
Page of 4881
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
781 to 800 of 97618 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Historical wealth-tax records, valuation reports and family-distribution evidence can substantiate ancestral and self-owned jewellery; non-filing of later wealth-tax returns, without evidence of disposal, does not establish that prior holdings were sold. Accordingly, jewellery disclosed in Schedule AL could not be treated as unexplained merely because original purchase bills were unavailable. Brokerage paid to a Hindu undivided family is not deductible as investment cost for capital-gains exemption where no family fund or asset generated the income and its Karta or coparcener was separately paid for the same personal services. Recipient confirmation or taxability does not establish deductibility; the brokerage disallowance remained sustainable.
Historical wealth-tax records, valuation reports and family-distribution evidence can substantiate ancestral and self-owned jewellery; non-filing of later wealth-tax returns, without evidence of disposal, does not establish that prior holdings were sold. Accordingly, jewellery disclosed in Schedule AL could not be treated as unexplained merely because original purchase bills were unavailable. Brokerage paid to a Hindu undivided family is not deductible as investment cost for capital-gains exemption where no family fund or asset generated the income and its Karta or coparcener was separately paid for the same personal services. Recipient confirmation or taxability does not establish deductibility; the brokerage disallowance remained sustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
