Transfer-pricing benchmarking confines adjustments to associated-enterprise transactions and integrates delayed receivables through TNMM working-capit...
Medical relief status protects government-contracted mobile healthcare from commercial classification, while provisional registration cancellation req...
Charitable registration cancellation requires proof that educational activities abandoned their objects; incidental receipts and retained surplus are ...
Prospective customs notification amendments cannot bar provisional release consideration for earlier imports when bills of lading predate their commen...
Personal guarantor insolvency jurisdiction follows the corporate debtor's CIRP Bench, enabling inter-territorial transfer and preventing parallel proc...
Section 47-A undervaluation threshold: fraudulent intent requirement faces reconsideration after referral to a larger Bench for authoritative resoluti...
RBI supersession powers over multi-State co-operative banks operate independently of the constitutional six-month ceiling and permit statutory extensi...
Page of 4883
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
941 to 960 of 97649 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Customs-duty refund limitation for provisionally assessed duty runs from communication of the final assessment order to the person entitled to claim refund, rather than from the order's date. A limitation period cannot begin before the claimant has actual or constructive knowledge of the order creating the remedy. Revenue must establish service through the prescribed statutory mode; mere despatch without proof of delivery is insufficient. In the absence of Revenue evidence of despatch or delivery, and with unrebutted postal evidence of receipt, the refund claim was treated as filed within the one-year period and remained eligible for consideration.
Customs-duty refund limitation for provisionally assessed duty runs from communication of the final assessment order to the person entitled to claim refund, rather than from the order's date. A limitation period cannot begin before the claimant has actual or constructive knowledge of the order creating the remedy. Revenue must establish service through the prescribed statutory mode; mere despatch without proof of delivery is insufficient. In the absence of Revenue evidence of despatch or delivery, and with unrebutted postal evidence of receipt, the refund claim was treated as filed within the one-year period and remained eligible for consideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.