Charitable sports promotion: sponsorship receipts alone did not defeat registration where funds supported tournaments and player development activitie...
Overdue associated-enterprise receivables: debt-free status defeated notional-interest adjustment, while employee stock-option costs qualified as busi...
Retrospective assessment-limitation amendments validate final orders while contemporaneous segment data governs transfer-pricing comparability and tol...
Transfer pricing adjustments must track international transactions, while unsupported AMP adjustments and unsuitable manufacturing comparables require...
Transfer-pricing adjustments must reflect functional comparability, working-capital effects, and avoid duplicating interest on associated-enterprise r...
Page of 4884
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
981 to 1000 of 97661 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty for cash receipt of immovable-property sale...
Foundational assessment satisfaction is essential before initiating penalty for cash receipt of immovable-property sale consideration under section 271D.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Penalty for cash receipt of immovable-property sale consideration requires foundational satisfaction during assessment proceedings that section 269SS was contravened and that penalty proceedings should be initiated. The Joint Commissioner's separate authority to impose penalty cannot cure the absence of this recorded satisfaction through a later show-cause notice. Where the assessment order contains no finding of contravention or indication of proposed penalty proceedings, subsequent initiation lacks jurisdiction; participation by the assessee does not validate it. The penalty under section 271D was consequently quashed, while the alternative reasonable-cause plea remained open.
Penalty for cash receipt of immovable-property sale consideration requires foundational satisfaction during assessment proceedings that section 269SS was contravened and that penalty proceedings should be initiated. The Joint Commissioner's separate authority to impose penalty cannot cure the absence of this recorded satisfaction through a later show-cause notice. Where the assessment order contains no finding of contravention or indication of proposed penalty proceedings, subsequent initiation lacks jurisdiction; participation by the assessee does not validate it. The penalty under section 271D was consequently quashed, while the alternative reasonable-cause plea remained open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.