Transfer-pricing tolerance for software sub-licensing falls within the services range, eliminating the adjustment and requiring TDS-credit verificatio...
Customs Broker due diligence requires prescribed KYC, not detecting misdeclarations discoverable only through physical examination, defeating licence ...
E-filing system failure permits exclusion of affected time in insolvency appeals, preventing tribunal technology defects from defeating timely filings...
Pre-existing disputes over outcome-based professional fees can bar Section 9 insolvency proceedings where contractual entitlement requires investigati...
Corresponding scheduled offences preserve money-laundering jurisdiction despite repeal of the central corruption provision where conduct remains cover...
Penalty for cash receipt of immovable-property sale...
Foundational assessment satisfaction is essential before initiating penalty for cash receipt of immovable-property sale consideration under section 271D.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Penalty for cash receipt of immovable-property sale consideration requires foundational satisfaction during assessment proceedings that section 269SS was contravened and that penalty proceedings should be initiated. The Joint Commissioner's separate authority to impose penalty cannot cure the absence of this recorded satisfaction through a later show-cause notice. Where the assessment order contains no finding of contravention or indication of proposed penalty proceedings, subsequent initiation lacks jurisdiction; participation by the assessee does not validate it. The penalty under section 271D was consequently quashed, while the alternative reasonable-cause plea remained open.
Penalty for cash receipt of immovable-property sale consideration requires foundational satisfaction during assessment proceedings that section 269SS was contravened and that penalty proceedings should be initiated. The Joint Commissioner's separate authority to impose penalty cannot cure the absence of this recorded satisfaction through a later show-cause notice. Where the assessment order contains no finding of contravention or indication of proposed penalty proceedings, subsequent initiation lacks jurisdiction; participation by the assessee does not validate it. The penalty under section 271D was consequently quashed, while the alternative reasonable-cause plea remained open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.