Credit-note turnover adjustments preserve inverted-duty refunds, while ministerial re-computation does not constitute an impermissible appellate reman...
Revisional jurisdiction over export quota premium deductions requires both error and Revenue prejudice; a permissible assessment view cannot be displa...
Final benami adjudication bars contradictory tax-evasion prosecution where settlement findings confirm full disclosure and cooperation without conceal...
Penalty for cash receipt of immovable-property sale...
Foundational assessment satisfaction is essential before initiating penalty for cash receipt of immovable-property sale consideration under section 271D.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Penalty for cash receipt of immovable-property sale consideration requires foundational satisfaction during assessment proceedings that section 269SS was contravened and that penalty proceedings should be initiated. The Joint Commissioner's separate authority to impose penalty cannot cure the absence of this recorded satisfaction through a later show-cause notice. Where the assessment order contains no finding of contravention or indication of proposed penalty proceedings, subsequent initiation lacks jurisdiction; participation by the assessee does not validate it. The penalty under section 271D was consequently quashed, while the alternative reasonable-cause plea remained open.
Penalty for cash receipt of immovable-property sale consideration requires foundational satisfaction during assessment proceedings that section 269SS was contravened and that penalty proceedings should be initiated. The Joint Commissioner's separate authority to impose penalty cannot cure the absence of this recorded satisfaction through a later show-cause notice. Where the assessment order contains no finding of contravention or indication of proposed penalty proceedings, subsequent initiation lacks jurisdiction; participation by the assessee does not validate it. The penalty under section 271D was consequently quashed, while the alternative reasonable-cause plea remained open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.