GST payment representations require record-based, reasoned decisions while substantive entitlement remains open for determination by competent authori...
Reassessment sanction under extended limitation required approval from the competent specified authority, invalidating proceedings approved by an inco...
Internal CUP benchmarking for fixed-rate Masala Bonds prevails over floating external comparables, eliminating the related transfer-pricing adjustment...
Jurisdictional validity of revision notices: incorrect official capacity and mere change of opinion invalidate revision of property income assessments...
Section 56(2)(x)(b), introduced by the Finance Act 2018 and applicable from Assessment Year 2019-20, operates prospectively. It cannot tax the difference between purchase consideration and stamp value where an immovable-property purchase agreement was executed in 2013 and substantial consideration was paid through banking channels before the provision was inserted. On those facts, the stamp-value-difference addition was deleted and the appellate order sustaining it was set aside.
Section 56(2)(x)(b), introduced by the Finance Act 2018 and applicable from Assessment Year 2019-20, operates prospectively. It cannot tax the difference between purchase consideration and stamp value where an immovable-property purchase agreement was executed in 2013 and substantial consideration was paid through banking channels before the provision was inserted. On those facts, the stamp-value-difference addition was deleted and the appellate order sustaining it was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.