Departmental appeal limitation after call-book recall preserves original filing, while documented correlation supports SAD refund on imported granules...
Income-tax prosecution fails when appellate remand removes its factual foundation; directors require company arraignment for vicarious criminal liabil...
Capital character of assignment consideration prevents taxation as residuary income, while unsupported interest-related expenditure remains non-deduct...
Make-available condition shields regional support-service receipts from Indian taxation where no independent capability or permanent establishment exi...
Transfer-pricing treatment of corporate guarantees and convertible loans followed prior-year consistency, with taxable foreign dividends excluded from...
Transfer-pricing benchmarking confines adjustments to associated-enterprise transactions and integrates delayed receivables through TNMM working-capit...
Section 56(2)(x)(b), introduced by the Finance Act 2018 and applicable from Assessment Year 2019-20, operates prospectively. It cannot tax the difference between purchase consideration and stamp value where an immovable-property purchase agreement was executed in 2013 and substantial consideration was paid through banking channels before the provision was inserted. On those facts, the stamp-value-difference addition was deleted and the appellate order sustaining it was set aside.
Section 56(2)(x)(b), introduced by the Finance Act 2018 and applicable from Assessment Year 2019-20, operates prospectively. It cannot tax the difference between purchase consideration and stamp value where an immovable-property purchase agreement was executed in 2013 and substantial consideration was paid through banking channels before the provision was inserted. On those facts, the stamp-value-difference addition was deleted and the appellate order sustaining it was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.