Revisional jurisdiction over export quota premium deductions requires both error and Revenue prejudice; a permissible assessment view cannot be displa...
Final benami adjudication bars contradictory tax-evasion prosecution where settlement findings confirm full disclosure and cooperation without conceal...
Faceless assessment and registration procedures are updated through electronic communication, revised recovery rules, extended deadlines, and replacem...
Risk-based selective vessel boarding requires accurate declarations and preserves master and agent liability where physical inspections are not select...
Assessment issued in the name of an amalgamating company that had ceased to exist, after the Revenue had been informed of the amalgamation, constitutes a jurisdictional defect rather than a procedural irregularity. Section 292B does not cure this defect, and participation in assessment proceedings does not create an estoppel against law. The assessment was quashed as void ab initio on the additional jurisdictional ground, while the remaining merits grounds were left open as academic.
Assessment issued in the name of an amalgamating company that had ceased to exist, after the Revenue had been informed of the amalgamation, constitutes a jurisdictional defect rather than a procedural irregularity. Section 292B does not cure this defect, and participation in assessment proceedings does not create an estoppel against law. The assessment was quashed as void ab initio on the additional jurisdictional ground, while the remaining merits grounds were left open as academic.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4884 
