Commodity derivatives position limits adopt revised breach penalties, broad commodity criteria, and client open-position limits based on deliverable s...
Effective hearing in GST adjudication requires actual opportunity to respond; ineffective service through a former auditor invalidated ex parte procee...
Third-party search material requires special assessment route, rendering general reassessment notices without jurisdiction when it forms the proceedin...
Transfer-pricing adjustments must be confined to international associated-enterprise transactions, while functionally dissimilar comparables remain ex...
Insolvency moratorium bars income-tax revision proceedings against corporate debtors until the moratorium ends, preserving merits for later determinat...
Page of 4897
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1141 to 1160 of 97923 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Diversion of income by overriding title arose where a collaboration agreement, banking records, ledger accounts and supporting material established the collaborator's entitlement to a share of flat-sale proceeds. That share did not accrue as the assessee's income because the agreement imposed an overriding obligation; procedural non-compliance, stamp-paper objections, lack of witnesses or doubts about expertise did not establish a fictitious income-diversion device. The resulting addition was deleted. Land acquisition cost could not be disallowed on the basis that it was absent from the books, since the books recorded the land and the purchase deed substantiated acquisition. The unexplained-source inference and related disallowance were deleted.
Diversion of income by overriding title arose where a collaboration agreement, banking records, ledger accounts and supporting material established the collaborator's entitlement to a share of flat-sale proceeds. That share did not accrue as the assessee's income because the agreement imposed an overriding obligation; procedural non-compliance, stamp-paper objections, lack of witnesses or doubts about expertise did not establish a fictitious income-diversion device. The resulting addition was deleted. Land acquisition cost could not be disallowed on the basis that it was absent from the books, since the books recorded the land and the purchase deed substantiated acquisition. The unexplained-source inference and related disallowance were deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.