Questions arising from miscellaneous application orders cannot challenge unaltered Tribunal findings, leaving the original order separately challengea...
Transfer-pricing comparability filters require fresh arm's-length analysis, while delayed receivables need separate reconsideration with working-capit...
Section 153C jurisdiction requires timely deemed search and assessee-specific satisfaction material; otherwise reassessment must use the proper statut...
Liquidation-process amendments apply prospectively unless expressly made retrospective. A liquidation order fixing the liquidation commencement date and directing the liquidator to explore sale of the corporate debtor as a going concern initiates the governing process; later auction and sale steps merely implement it. A subsequent amendment therefore cannot alter rights and obligations under the regime applicable on that date. The Tribunal set aside retrospective application of the amendment and remanded consequential reliefs and concessions for fresh consideration according to law.
Liquidation-process amendments apply prospectively unless expressly made retrospective. A liquidation order fixing the liquidation commencement date and directing the liquidator to explore sale of the corporate debtor as a going concern initiates the governing process; later auction and sale steps merely implement it. A subsequent amendment therefore cannot alter rights and obligations under the regime applicable on that date. The Tribunal set aside retrospective application of the amendment and remanded consequential reliefs and concessions for fresh consideration according to law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.