E-filing system failure permits exclusion of affected time in insolvency appeals, preventing tribunal technology defects from defeating timely filings...
Pre-existing disputes over outcome-based professional fees can bar Section 9 insolvency proceedings where contractual entitlement requires investigati...
Way Leave Permissions cannot be retrospectively revived through insolvency plans, and affected infrastructure holders require safety review and hearin...
Personal guarantor insolvency jurisdiction follows the corporate debtor's CIRP Bench, enabling inter-territorial transfer and preventing parallel proc...
Liquidation-process amendments apply prospectively unless expressly made retrospective. A liquidation order fixing the liquidation commencement date and directing the liquidator to explore sale of the corporate debtor as a going concern initiates the governing process; later auction and sale steps merely implement it. A subsequent amendment therefore cannot alter rights and obligations under the regime applicable on that date. The Tribunal set aside retrospective application of the amendment and remanded consequential reliefs and concessions for fresh consideration according to law.
Liquidation-process amendments apply prospectively unless expressly made retrospective. A liquidation order fixing the liquidation commencement date and directing the liquidator to explore sale of the corporate debtor as a going concern initiates the governing process; later auction and sale steps merely implement it. A subsequent amendment therefore cannot alter rights and obligations under the regime applicable on that date. The Tribunal set aside retrospective application of the amendment and remanded consequential reliefs and concessions for fresh consideration according to law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.