Alternative statutory remedy and delay bar GST writ challenges despite pending rectification, while distinct subject matter permits parallel proceedin...
Unverified Insight Portal Information Cannot Justify Reassessment Without a Verified Taxpayer-Specific Income-Escape Nexus or Demonstrated Application...
Assessing Officer jurisdiction after statutory transfer invalidates reassessment notices issued by transferor officers and nullifies resulting proceed...
Consequential appeal-effect orders must implement rectification deleting working-capital adjustments and reconsider the resulting arm's-length range c...
Discounted cash flow valuation protects share premium where projections are reasonable, while audited book expenses defeat unexplained-expenditure add...
Section 54 construction relief survives pre-transfer commencement when completion occurs within the statutory period, excluding ineligible spouse-owne...
Page of 4894
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
481 to 500 of 97862 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Service of notice and opportunity of hearing were treated as adequate where the director knew of the investigation, sought time to respond, then neither replied nor updated the address despite repeated service attempts. No breach of natural justice arose from non-cooperation. Non-realisation of export proceeds triggered a statutory presumption that reasonable recovery steps had not been taken. As the director was in charge during the contravention and did not establish realisation or efforts to obtain information from the Official Liquidator, company liquidation did not remove liability. The penalty was sustained but confined to the amount already deposited, considering the elapsed period and liquidation.
Service of notice and opportunity of hearing were treated as adequate where the director knew of the investigation, sought time to respond, then neither replied nor updated the address despite repeated service attempts. No breach of natural justice arose from non-cooperation. Non-realisation of export proceeds triggered a statutory presumption that reasonable recovery steps had not been taken. As the director was in charge during the contravention and did not establish realisation or efforts to obtain information from the Official Liquidator, company liquidation did not remove liability. The penalty was sustained but confined to the amount already deposited, considering the elapsed period and liquidation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4894 
