GST payment representations require record-based, reasoned decisions while substantive entitlement remains open for determination by competent authori...
Reassessment sanction under extended limitation required approval from the competent specified authority, invalidating proceedings approved by an inco...
Internal CUP benchmarking for fixed-rate Masala Bonds prevails over floating external comparables, eliminating the related transfer-pricing adjustment...
Jurisdictional validity of revision notices: incorrect official capacity and mere change of opinion invalidate revision of property income assessments...
Penalty under section 271AAC(1) was not sustainable where unexplained cash deposits were assessed only by estimating and restricting the addition to a profit percentage. An ad hoc estimated addition did not, by itself, establish conscious concealment or undisclosed income. The penalty levied solely on that estimated addition was therefore deleted, and the appeal was allowed.
Penalty under section 271AAC(1) was not sustainable where unexplained cash deposits were assessed only by estimating and restricting the addition to a profit percentage. An ad hoc estimated addition did not, by itself, establish conscious concealment or undisclosed income. The penalty levied solely on that estimated addition was therefore deleted, and the appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.