Commodity derivatives position limits adopt revised breach penalties, broad commodity criteria, and client open-position limits based on deliverable s...
Concurrent factual findings established that the appellant had transferred title to the imported goods and was not their owner. The goods were consigned to fictitious importing firms lacking importer-exporter codes and were routed without proper banking channels, supporting findings of systematic fraud and illegal importation. These factual findings warranted confiscation and penalty and did not raise a substantial question of law. Confiscation, refusal of re-shipment and penalty were sustained, and the customs appeal was dismissed.
Concurrent factual findings established that the appellant had transferred title to the imported goods and was not their owner. The goods were consigned to fictitious importing firms lacking importer-exporter codes and were routed without proper banking channels, supporting findings of systematic fraud and illegal importation. These factual findings warranted confiscation and penalty and did not raise a substantial question of law. Confiscation, refusal of re-shipment and penalty were sustained, and the customs appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
