Personal guarantor insolvency jurisdiction follows the corporate debtor's CIRP Bench, enabling inter-territorial transfer and preventing parallel proc...
Section 47-A undervaluation threshold: fraudulent intent requirement faces reconsideration after referral to a larger Bench for authoritative resoluti...
RBI supersession powers over multi-State co-operative banks operate independently of the constitutional six-month ceiling and permit statutory extensi...
Section 60(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code requires an...
Personal guarantor insolvency jurisdiction follows the corporate debtor's CIRP Bench, enabling inter-territorial transfer and preventing parallel proceedings.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Section 60(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code requires an insolvency application against a personal guarantor to be filed before the same NCLT Bench where the corporate debtor's CIRP or liquidation is pending, overriding the territorial criterion in Section 60(1). This alignment supports consolidated proceedings, consistency and avoidance of conflicting outcomes. Rule 16(d) of the NCLT Rules permits the President to transfer such proceedings between Benches when necessary to implement Section 60(2); the power is not limited to Benches within one territorial location. Proceedings filed before a Bench lacking this jurisdiction may be quashed, with liberty to file before the competent Bench.
Section 60(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code requires an insolvency application against a personal guarantor to be filed before the same NCLT Bench where the corporate debtor's CIRP or liquidation is pending, overriding the territorial criterion in Section 60(1). This alignment supports consolidated proceedings, consistency and avoidance of conflicting outcomes. Rule 16(d) of the NCLT Rules permits the President to transfer such proceedings between Benches when necessary to implement Section 60(2); the power is not limited to Benches within one territorial location. Proceedings filed before a Bench lacking this jurisdiction may be quashed, with liberty to file before the competent Bench.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.