Reassessment sanction under extended limitation required approval from the competent specified authority, invalidating proceedings approved by an inco...
Internal CUP benchmarking for fixed-rate Masala Bonds prevails over floating external comparables, eliminating the related transfer-pricing adjustment...
Jurisdictional validity of revision notices: incorrect official capacity and mere change of opinion invalidate revision of property income assessments...
Pre-existing disputes concerning the genuineness of purchase orders, supplies and underlying operational-debt transactions prevent corporate insolvency resolution proceedings from being used to determine contested claims. Information Utility records marked the debt as disputed, while the corporate debtor's legal notice and fraud-related complaints pre-dated the demand notice. As the dispute was neither spurious nor illusory and required detailed trial, a Section 9 application was not maintainable for adjudicating it. Rejection of the operational creditor's insolvency application was therefore sustained, and the appeal was dismissed.
Pre-existing disputes concerning the genuineness of purchase orders, supplies and underlying operational-debt transactions prevent corporate insolvency resolution proceedings from being used to determine contested claims. Information Utility records marked the debt as disputed, while the corporate debtor's legal notice and fraud-related complaints pre-dated the demand notice. As the dispute was neither spurious nor illusory and required detailed trial, a Section 9 application was not maintainable for adjudicating it. Rejection of the operational creditor's insolvency application was therefore sustained, and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.