Questions arising from miscellaneous application orders cannot challenge unaltered Tribunal findings, leaving the original order separately challengea...
Transfer-pricing comparability filters require fresh arm's-length analysis, while delayed receivables need separate reconsideration with working-capit...
Section 153C jurisdiction requires timely deemed search and assessee-specific satisfaction material; otherwise reassessment must use the proper statut...
Pre-existing disputes concerning the genuineness of purchase orders, supplies and underlying operational-debt transactions prevent corporate insolvency resolution proceedings from being used to determine contested claims. Information Utility records marked the debt as disputed, while the corporate debtor's legal notice and fraud-related complaints pre-dated the demand notice. As the dispute was neither spurious nor illusory and required detailed trial, a Section 9 application was not maintainable for adjudicating it. Rejection of the operational creditor's insolvency application was therefore sustained, and the appeal was dismissed.
Pre-existing disputes concerning the genuineness of purchase orders, supplies and underlying operational-debt transactions prevent corporate insolvency resolution proceedings from being used to determine contested claims. Information Utility records marked the debt as disputed, while the corporate debtor's legal notice and fraud-related complaints pre-dated the demand notice. As the dispute was neither spurious nor illusory and required detailed trial, a Section 9 application was not maintainable for adjudicating it. Rejection of the operational creditor's insolvency application was therefore sustained, and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.