E-filing system failure permits exclusion of affected time in insolvency appeals, preventing tribunal technology defects from defeating timely filings...
Pre-existing disputes over outcome-based professional fees can bar Section 9 insolvency proceedings where contractual entitlement requires investigati...
Corresponding scheduled offences preserve money-laundering jurisdiction despite repeal of the central corruption provision where conduct remains cover...
Priority under section 26E of the Securitisation Act favours a bank's registered security interest over an Income Tax attachment where the Department has not publicly proclaimed the attachment in the prescribed manner or registered its claim or attachment order with CERSAI. A prior attachment alone does not displace the secured creditor's statutory priority. The attachment and resulting encumbrance must be removed to the extent they obstruct recovery of the bank's secured dues, while the Income Tax Department may recover its dues from surplus sale proceeds or other assets in accordance with law.
Priority under section 26E of the Securitisation Act favours a bank's registered security interest over an Income Tax attachment where the Department has not publicly proclaimed the attachment in the prescribed manner or registered its claim or attachment order with CERSAI. A prior attachment alone does not displace the secured creditor's statutory priority. The attachment and resulting encumbrance must be removed to the extent they obstruct recovery of the bank's secured dues, while the Income Tax Department may recover its dues from surplus sale proceeds or other assets in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4891 
