Coercive recovery during GST searches is restrained pending scrutiny, preserving normal business operations and requiring adherence to investigation g...
COVID-19 limitation exclusion and destination-specific e-way bills govern revisional timelines and penalties for undocumented third-party plywood deli...
Questions arising from miscellaneous application orders cannot challenge unaltered Tribunal findings, leaving the original order separately challengea...
Transfer-pricing comparability filters require fresh arm's-length analysis, while delayed receivables need separate reconsideration with working-capit...
Page of 4894
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
721 to 740 of 97867 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Omission of rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules without a saving clause applies to all proceedings pending on the date of omission, preventing the rule's restrictions from governing those matters. Section 6 of the General Clauses Act does not preserve pending proceedings after omission of a rule; their continuation requires an express saving provision or a statutory legal device. Unlike the Central Excise and Customs laws, GST law contains no comparable saving clause. CBIC may accept the Supreme Court's stated position.
Omission of rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules without a saving clause applies to all proceedings pending on the date of omission, preventing the rule's restrictions from governing those matters. Section 6 of the General Clauses Act does not preserve pending proceedings after omission of a rule; their continuation requires an express saving provision or a statutory legal device. Unlike the Central Excise and Customs laws, GST law contains no comparable saving clause. CBIC may accept the Supreme Court's stated position.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4894 
