Personal guarantor insolvency jurisdiction follows the corporate debtor's CIRP Bench, enabling inter-territorial transfer and preventing parallel proc...
Section 47-A undervaluation threshold: fraudulent intent requirement faces reconsideration after referral to a larger Bench for authoritative resoluti...
RBI supersession powers over multi-State co-operative banks operate independently of the constitutional six-month ceiling and permit statutory extensi...
PMLA attachment of a company's properties requires a demonstrated nexus between the alleged proceeds of crime and a scheduled offence. Share application money linked to coal-block allocation could not be treated as proceeds of crime where investor statements did not show that the allocation induced the investments, and allegations of director-controlled entities or public-fund involvement lacked supporting particulars, complaint or FIR. The attachment confirmation was set aside for the appellant company because the requisite connection between the funds and the scheduled offence was not established.
PMLA attachment of a company's properties requires a demonstrated nexus between the alleged proceeds of crime and a scheduled offence. Share application money linked to coal-block allocation could not be treated as proceeds of crime where investor statements did not show that the allocation induced the investments, and allegations of director-controlled entities or public-fund involvement lacked supporting particulars, complaint or FIR. The attachment confirmation was set aside for the appellant company because the requisite connection between the funds and the scheduled offence was not established.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.