Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Functional comparability governs software-service benchmarking: dissimilar companies are excluded, while related-party filters, margins and working-ca...
Transfer-pricing benchmarking for administrative and marketing...
Functional comparability governs selection of support-service and IT-enabled service comparables, with verification required for unresolved data and margin issues.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Transfer-pricing benchmarking for administrative and marketing support services requires functional similarity and adequate segmental data. Engineering consultancy, construction-related activities, trading and mixed sales-service operations, commission agency and technical services are unsuitable comparables; a different financial year alone does not require exclusion where an appropriate adjustment is possible. For IT-enabled services, outsourcing businesses without segmental information and knowledge-process outsourcing providers are functionally dissimilar. Proposed comparables needing review of segmental or financial data, including those affected by a service-income filter, require verification and fresh computation. Claimed comparable-margin corrections and risk adjustments depend on substantiation, factual reconciliation and consequential examination.
Transfer-pricing benchmarking for administrative and marketing support services requires functional similarity and adequate segmental data. Engineering consultancy, construction-related activities, trading and mixed sales-service operations, commission agency and technical services are unsuitable comparables; a different financial year alone does not require exclusion where an appropriate adjustment is possible. For IT-enabled services, outsourcing businesses without segmental information and knowledge-process outsourcing providers are functionally dissimilar. Proposed comparables needing review of segmental or financial data, including those affected by a service-income filter, require verification and fresh computation. Claimed comparable-margin corrections and risk adjustments depend on substantiation, factual reconciliation and consequential examination.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.