Commitment proceedings gain extended timelines, structured defect refiling, and automatic resumption of inquiry after the adjusted completion period e...
Centralised assessment transfer becomes unwarranted once the searched person's assessment is complete, requiring restoration to the appropriate charge...
Co-operative deduction eligibility excludes refund and commercial-bank interest, while qualifying co-operative investments require entity-wise verific...
Enhanced tax rate on surrendered unexplained income applies prospectively, while cash-deposit telescoping requires verification of available surrender...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Charitable purpose is not defeated where sponsorship receipts from a women's marathon have a real and proximate nexus with objects of women's health, fitness, awareness and empowerment. The proviso to section 2(15) requires proof that the recipient's activity intrinsically operates as trade, commerce or business; sponsors' advertising treatment, receipt magnitude or surplus alone is insufficient. The 20% receipts formulation did not apply for the relevant assessment year, and exceeding the applicable monetary threshold could not replace that proof. Consequently, section 13(8) could not deny exemption under sections 11 and 12. Form No. 10B furnished during assessment cured an erroneous original exemption form where audit was completed before return filing and eligibility was examined on merits; the lapse was procedural.
Charitable purpose is not defeated where sponsorship receipts from a women's marathon have a real and proximate nexus with objects of women's health, fitness, awareness and empowerment. The proviso to section 2(15) requires proof that the recipient's activity intrinsically operates as trade, commerce or business; sponsors' advertising treatment, receipt magnitude or surplus alone is insufficient. The 20% receipts formulation did not apply for the relevant assessment year, and exceeding the applicable monetary threshold could not replace that proof. Consequently, section 13(8) could not deny exemption under sections 11 and 12. Form No. 10B furnished during assessment cured an erroneous original exemption form where audit was completed before return filing and eligibility was examined on merits; the lapse was procedural.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.