Income Declaration Scheme declarations can evidence share-capital sources, while round-tripped funds and cash-linked credits require further verificat...
Permanent establishment tests: independent subsidiary premises and principal-to-principal dealings did not create Indian taxability for offshore suppl...
Valuation Officer estimates govern property-value additions once statutory valuation is invoked, requiring fresh consideration of objections and compa...
Waiver of written show-cause notice may prevent a later procedural challenge after participation in customs adjudication, preserving statutory appella...
Retrospective invalidity of ocean-freight IGST supports refunds despite non-party status and prior credit utilisation, subject to authorised appeal gr...
Additional evidence in departmental appeals may include show-cause-notice material without introducing a new case where it merely corroborates existin...
Charitable purpose is not defeated where sponsorship receipts from a women's marathon have a real and proximate nexus with objects of women's health, fitness, awareness and empowerment. The proviso to section 2(15) requires proof that the recipient's activity intrinsically operates as trade, commerce or business; sponsors' advertising treatment, receipt magnitude or surplus alone is insufficient. The 20% receipts formulation did not apply for the relevant assessment year, and exceeding the applicable monetary threshold could not replace that proof. Consequently, section 13(8) could not deny exemption under sections 11 and 12. Form No. 10B furnished during assessment cured an erroneous original exemption form where audit was completed before return filing and eligibility was examined on merits; the lapse was procedural.
Charitable purpose is not defeated where sponsorship receipts from a women's marathon have a real and proximate nexus with objects of women's health, fitness, awareness and empowerment. The proviso to section 2(15) requires proof that the recipient's activity intrinsically operates as trade, commerce or business; sponsors' advertising treatment, receipt magnitude or surplus alone is insufficient. The 20% receipts formulation did not apply for the relevant assessment year, and exceeding the applicable monetary threshold could not replace that proof. Consequently, section 13(8) could not deny exemption under sections 11 and 12. Form No. 10B furnished during assessment cured an erroneous original exemption form where audit was completed before return filing and eligibility was examined on merits; the lapse was procedural.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.