Additional evidence in departmental appeals may include show-cause-notice material without introducing a new case where it merely corroborates existin...
Reasoned rectification orders require consideration of expenditure disclosed in income-tax returns, preventing revision based on incomplete income com...
Modified returns after business reorganisations cannot trigger fresh scrutiny once the original assessment was complete, invalidating related transfer...
Third-party loose sheets require reliable nexus before supporting unexplained expenditure additions; presumptions do not establish payer identity or o...
TNMM comparability using audited accounts and working-capital adjustments can eliminate unwarranted transfer-pricing additions where verified margins ...
Gross-profit additions on disputed purchases require reasoned appellate determination; disclosed claims alone do not support inaccurate-particulars pe...
Limitation after transfer-pricing remand: fresh TPO reference did not extend the assessment deadline, rendering the consequential assessment time-barr...
Interim judicial restraint on tax deduction prevents default, while supporting reasonable cause and penalty deletion for foreign-leg LFC reimbursement...
Judicial review of Settlement Commission orders is limited to...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantification.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Judicial review of Settlement Commission orders is limited to jurisdictional or statutory infirmity, prejudice, fraud, bias or malice and cannot operate as an appellate reassessment of the underlying adjudication. Where parties voluntarily settle proceedings arising from a show cause notice without pursuing the statutory appeal, they cannot reopen the notice's validity on limitation or reasonable-period grounds by challenging a consequential interest direction. Statutory interest remains a consequence of customs duty liability despite settlement of the duty quantum. Verification and quantification of further interest by the jurisdictional Commissioner may therefore be directed, subject to any independently maintainable challenge to the statutory computation.
Judicial review of Settlement Commission orders is limited to jurisdictional or statutory infirmity, prejudice, fraud, bias or malice and cannot operate as an appellate reassessment of the underlying adjudication. Where parties voluntarily settle proceedings arising from a show cause notice without pursuing the statutory appeal, they cannot reopen the notice's validity on limitation or reasonable-period grounds by challenging a consequential interest direction. Statutory interest remains a consequence of customs duty liability despite settlement of the duty quantum. Verification and quantification of further interest by the jurisdictional Commissioner may therefore be directed, subject to any independently maintainable challenge to the statutory computation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.