Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Judicial review of Settlement Commission orders is limited to...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantification.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Judicial review of Settlement Commission orders is limited to jurisdictional or statutory infirmity, prejudice, fraud, bias or malice and cannot operate as an appellate reassessment of the underlying adjudication. Where parties voluntarily settle proceedings arising from a show cause notice without pursuing the statutory appeal, they cannot reopen the notice's validity on limitation or reasonable-period grounds by challenging a consequential interest direction. Statutory interest remains a consequence of customs duty liability despite settlement of the duty quantum. Verification and quantification of further interest by the jurisdictional Commissioner may therefore be directed, subject to any independently maintainable challenge to the statutory computation.
Judicial review of Settlement Commission orders is limited to jurisdictional or statutory infirmity, prejudice, fraud, bias or malice and cannot operate as an appellate reassessment of the underlying adjudication. Where parties voluntarily settle proceedings arising from a show cause notice without pursuing the statutory appeal, they cannot reopen the notice's validity on limitation or reasonable-period grounds by challenging a consequential interest direction. Statutory interest remains a consequence of customs duty liability despite settlement of the duty quantum. Verification and quantification of further interest by the jurisdictional Commissioner may therefore be directed, subject to any independently maintainable challenge to the statutory computation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.