Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
241 to 260 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Statutory appellate remedy before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal must ordinarily be pursued against NCLT orders, including orders approving revised resolution plans under the insolvency process. Writ jurisdiction should not be exercised where that effective appellate remedy is available. The Supreme Court set aside interim orders that had entertained writ applications challenging an NCLT order, while leaving the parties free to seek relief before the appropriate forum and keeping the merits of their grievances open.
Statutory appellate remedy before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal must ordinarily be pursued against NCLT orders, including orders approving revised resolution plans under the insolvency process. Writ jurisdiction should not be exercised where that effective appellate remedy is available. The Supreme Court set aside interim orders that had entertained writ applications challenging an NCLT order, while leaving the parties free to seek relief before the appropriate forum and keeping the merits of their grievances open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.