Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Page of 4894
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2001 to 2020 of 97867 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 10B requires separate computation of export profits for each eligible software-export undertaking only to quantify the deduction. That separate computation does not alter the undertaking's profit or loss for computing combined income, nor does it displace the normal rules for inter-source and inter-head set-off and carry forward of losses. Losses of a Section 10B-eligible undertaking may therefore be set off against profits of other undertakings, with any unabsorbed balance carried forward in accordance with law. The contrary denial of set-off was set aside.
Section 10B requires separate computation of export profits for each eligible software-export undertaking only to quantify the deduction. That separate computation does not alter the undertaking's profit or loss for computing combined income, nor does it displace the normal rules for inter-source and inter-head set-off and carry forward of losses. Losses of a Section 10B-eligible undertaking may therefore be set off against profits of other undertakings, with any unabsorbed balance carried forward in accordance with law. The contrary denial of set-off was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.