Fraud classification show-cause notices founded on inconclusive forensic audit material cannot sustain action, permitting fresh proceedings on conclus...
Appellate enhancement limits protect against new income sources, while documented credits and prior-year investments resist unexplained-income additio...
Section 263 revision requires the assessment order to be both erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. Where the Assessing Officer has called for and considered details on unsecured loans and trade payables, revision cannot rest merely on audit objections or an assumption that further inquiry would produce an addition under section 68. Explanation 2 creates a deeming framework for insufficient inquiry but does not remove the twin statutory requirements. In the stated circumstances, the assessment was made after inquiry, no revenue prejudice was identified, and the revisional order was quashed.
Section 263 revision requires the assessment order to be both erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. Where the Assessing Officer has called for and considered details on unsecured loans and trade payables, revision cannot rest merely on audit objections or an assumption that further inquiry would produce an addition under section 68. Explanation 2 creates a deeming framework for insufficient inquiry but does not remove the twin statutory requirements. In the stated circumstances, the assessment was made after inquiry, no revenue prejudice was identified, and the revisional order was quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4884 
