Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Reassessment against a dissolved partnership firm after its business succession is void where the Department had accepted that the firm ceased to exist and the successor proprietor disclosed and was assessed on the same business transactions and bank accounts. Assessing the erstwhile firm in these circumstances would duplicate taxation of the same business income. Jurisdiction for reassessment also requires recorded reasons identifying the relevant bank account or transaction and foundational material showing income escaped assessment; vague reasons do not meet that standard. A notice issued to a non-existent entity after succession renders the consequential assessment and estimated addition unsustainable.
Reassessment against a dissolved partnership firm after its business succession is void where the Department had accepted that the firm ceased to exist and the successor proprietor disclosed and was assessed on the same business transactions and bank accounts. Assessing the erstwhile firm in these circumstances would duplicate taxation of the same business income. Jurisdiction for reassessment also requires recorded reasons identifying the relevant bank account or transaction and foundational material showing income escaped assessment; vague reasons do not meet that standard. A notice issued to a non-existent entity after succession renders the consequential assessment and estimated addition unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.