Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Profits from an eligible windmill unit's electricity transferred for captive consumption qualify for deduction under section 80IA. The profit must be computed using the rate charged by the Electricity Board to consumers, rather than the lower rate paid by the Board to generating companies. Payments were not liable to disallowance merely because payees could not be produced after a substantial lapse of time or because expenditure had increased over earlier years. The nature of payees, including labourers, contractors and job workers, and the fact that several payments were below the tax-deduction threshold, precluded treatment of the payments as unexplained. Deduction for captive wind-generated electricity and the payment claims were consequently accepted.
Profits from an eligible windmill unit's electricity transferred for captive consumption qualify for deduction under section 80IA. The profit must be computed using the rate charged by the Electricity Board to consumers, rather than the lower rate paid by the Board to generating companies. Payments were not liable to disallowance merely because payees could not be produced after a substantial lapse of time or because expenditure had increased over earlier years. The nature of payees, including labourers, contractors and job workers, and the fact that several payments were below the tax-deduction threshold, precluded treatment of the payments as unexplained. Deduction for captive wind-generated electricity and the payment claims were consequently accepted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.