Fraud classification show-cause notices founded on inconclusive forensic audit material cannot sustain action, permitting fresh proceedings on conclus...
Appellate enhancement limits protect against new income sources, while documented credits and prior-year investments resist unexplained-income additio...
Indexed cost of improvement claimed on flats received under a joint development arrangement requires evidence of actual improvement works and related payments. Construction costs were contractually borne by the developer, and the flats were sold in the semi-furnished condition received from the developer. Quotations and estimates for proposed additional work did not establish material purchases, labour payments, or execution of improvements. The NALA component was also unsupported. Consequently, the claimed indexed cost of improvement was disallowed, and the appeal was dismissed.
Indexed cost of improvement claimed on flats received under a joint development arrangement requires evidence of actual improvement works and related payments. Construction costs were contractually borne by the developer, and the flats were sold in the semi-furnished condition received from the developer. Quotations and estimates for proposed additional work did not establish material purchases, labour payments, or execution of improvements. The NALA component was also unsupported. Consequently, the claimed indexed cost of improvement was disallowed, and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
