Infrastructure-development deduction remains available to EPC contractors when substantive statutory conditions outweigh contractor labels in agreemen...
Explained Investment Sources: documented gifts and traceable salary savings supported deletion of additions for property and mutual-fund SIP investmen...
Internal comparable pricing supports arm's-length interest on compulsorily convertible debentures, preventing their recharacterisation as equity for t...
Nominee director protection shields independent financial-institution appointees from criminal liability where they lack involvement in deposit defaul...
Indexed cost of improvement claimed on flats received under a joint development arrangement requires evidence of actual improvement works and related payments. Construction costs were contractually borne by the developer, and the flats were sold in the semi-furnished condition received from the developer. Quotations and estimates for proposed additional work did not establish material purchases, labour payments, or execution of improvements. The NALA component was also unsupported. Consequently, the claimed indexed cost of improvement was disallowed, and the appeal was dismissed.
Indexed cost of improvement claimed on flats received under a joint development arrangement requires evidence of actual improvement works and related payments. Construction costs were contractually borne by the developer, and the flats were sold in the semi-furnished condition received from the developer. Quotations and estimates for proposed additional work did not establish material purchases, labour payments, or execution of improvements. The NALA component was also unsupported. Consequently, the claimed indexed cost of improvement was disallowed, and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
