Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Public benefit requirement defeats charitable registration where residents' association services are reciprocal, member-only facilities governed by mu...
Penalty proceedings under Section 122 of the UPGST Act are...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through writ proceedings.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Penalty proceedings under Section 122 of the UPGST Act are subject to the proper-officer mechanism under Section 127, despite Section 122 not using the expression "proper officer". State circulars assign jurisdiction to the Deputy Commissioner for businesses above the prescribed turnover threshold, supporting the officer's authority to issue the show-cause notice. Although jurisdictional objections may be raised in writ proceedings, discretionary writ relief is ordinarily unavailable where the taxpayer participated on merits without objecting and later seeks to bypass the statutory appeal. The taxpayer was relegated to the appellate remedy and may seek Limitation Act protection if its requirements are met.
Penalty proceedings under Section 122 of the UPGST Act are subject to the proper-officer mechanism under Section 127, despite Section 122 not using the expression "proper officer". State circulars assign jurisdiction to the Deputy Commissioner for businesses above the prescribed turnover threshold, supporting the officer's authority to issue the show-cause notice. Although jurisdictional objections may be raised in writ proceedings, discretionary writ relief is ordinarily unavailable where the taxpayer participated on merits without objecting and later seeks to bypass the statutory appeal. The taxpayer was relegated to the appellate remedy and may seek Limitation Act protection if its requirements are met.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
